THE ORIGINAL JAWA LOOK

HANYA SATU SANDIWARA

KES PENYAPU BELUM DI SIASAT




KHIR TOYO HANYA 1% DARI KES JERUNG – harakah daily

Anggota Jawatankuasa Khas SPRM, Salahudin Ayub mendakwa, pendakwaan ke atas Mohd Khir Toyo hanya satu peratus daripada keseluruhan kes berprofil tinggi yang ada
Katanya, biarpun beliau mengalu-alukan pendakwaan oleh pihak Peguam Negara itu, namun rakyat tidak mudah untuk berasa teruja dengan tindakan itu.

Ini kerana, negara mempunyai pengalaman sewaktu Abdullah Abdullah Ahmad Badawi menjadi Perdana Menteri apabila dua kes berprofil tinggi yang didakwa di mahkamah, akhirnya digugurkan apabila menjelang pilihan raya.

"Ini satu peratus dari keseluruhan kes berprofil tinggi yang ada.

"Kita ada pengalaman zaman Mr Clean Abdullah Ahmad Badawi menangkap Eric Chia dan Kasitah Gadam, tetapi kes berprofil tinggi itu digugurkan bila berlaku pilihanraya," katanya yang juga Naib Presiden PAS.

NOTA:
penangkapan lee liong sik
penangkapan toyo
semua ini dilakuan sebagai satu sandiwara

kerana kalau mat mogol betul betul nak
melawan rasuah maka yang pertama
disiasat dan ditangkap ialah mat mongol sendiri

bagaimana kapal selam di beli?
siapa beri arahan bunuh altantuya?

sandiwara ini dilakukan untuk mengolah persetujuan orang ramai
berita ini di eramkan agak lama. di pilih hari yang baik untuk
ianya menetas – hari dimana harga minyak dan gula baru naik
adalah tarikh dan masa berita toyo ditangkap dipecahkan
ini di pangil – mengurus masaalah
dengan berita toyo ditangkap ini
maka berita kenaikan harga barang tengelam.

SEBELUM TEMPE - PURE JAWA LOOK

KHIR TOYO AKAN DI TANGKAP

kes jual beli tanah
di section 7
shah alam


APA KHABAR TOYO

pukul berapa cik toyo?
sapu sampah dimana?
bini bawa lari duit ke mana?
pemandu tu mana sudah cabut dengan 200 ekar tanah?

APA BAKAR CIK KHABAR?

JUST FANCY THAT

Archeologists found a long lost city in Johor. And all historians can't even begin to speak about the possible implications. Could the city really predate Borobudur and Angkor Wat? Could it really be the Kota Gelanggi alluded to in Sejarah Melayu? All history books on the history of the Malay people may become obsolete, and some of the theories which are at the moment on the periphery of historical discourse may be validated.

Could Kota Gelanggi be yet another kingdom that vied with Sri Vijaya and early polities for the position as the inheritor of the ancient Melayu kingdom? Or could it be just another Sri Vijayan capital before the flowering of Palembang? An inscription in Southern India enumerates a list of kingdoms that were pillaged and attacked by the Chola kings. Which one of them was Gelanggi? What kind of people lived in Gelanggi? Were they even ethnically Malay? Or only had cultural allegiance to the long-lost kingdom of Melayu?

The answers to the above can be found below courtesy of National Express Malaysia:
A small piece of History for our future generation.. Why Kota Gelanggi (lost city) touted as earliest civilization in Malay Peninsula news were banned as they were Buddhist The Johor find of 2005 which was quietly dropped was none other than Kota Gelanggi lost city reflecting Srivijaya and its Buddhist splendour.

But they deliberately disregarded it because that would have sidelined Malacca Empire and Islam which was smaller and came some 500 years later. I met Dr Lee Kam Hing, a former History prof at MU in Singapore recently at a seminar. Dr Lee, who is now Star research director, told me he was
trying his best to highlight Kota Gelanggi, but that the govt killed it off. This is clearly another case to cover up the real history of Malaya and fool the younger generations into believing that our history only began from Malacca

1400.. Not only that, they try to show Parameswara as Malay and Muslim, but actually he was Hindu! If one were to condemn these UMNO scumbags on how they distort history, it will never end....the condemnations will more than cover 10 PhD thesis!

A small piece of History for our future generation Hitler's public relations manager, Goebbels, once said, 'If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.'

Once again our government wiped out any references to a famous Melaka prince as being Hindu and
belonging to the powerful Hindu empire Sri Vijaya.

So all of a sudden our museums, school text-books etc. all refer to Parameswara as a Malay prince.
What race ruled or did not rule is besides the point. What is important is not butchering history to create your own truths. You cannot change your race even if you convert - Parameswara could have been responsible for Umno's proud heritage of ' Ketuanan Melayu '.

If this is what it is based on, there is no ' Ketuanan Melayu '. The lineage of Melaka Sultans are Indians, not Malays. It is no secret that Parameswara was an Indian and a Hindu prince. It is clear from records that Parameswara never converted to Islam. He was an Indian Hindu who fled Palembang in Sumatra to eventually found Melaka circa 1400 AD. It was Sri Maharaja who converted himself and the court of Melaka to Islam, and as a result took on the name of
Sultan Muhammad Shah sometime after 1435.

The most famous of Indian Hindu Kings were Raja Chola and his son Rajendra Chola who invaded Southern Thailand, Kedah, Perak, Johor and Sumatra about 1000 AD. This is Raja-raja Chola - the Indian/Hindu kings and not Raja Chulan - a Malay king. But what is really sad is that our children are
taught as though Malaysian history suddenly began in 1400 with an Islamic Melaka. We are led to believe that the Indians and Chinese first arrived on the shores of Malaysia in about 1850 as desperate indentured labourers, farmers and miners . Nothing could be further from the truth.

The cultural influences of India in particular, and China, in South East Asia span over 2,000 years,
starting with the arrival from India of the Brahmanical prince/scholar - Aji Saka in Java in AD78, through to Vietnam, Cambodia (Indo China), Thailand,Burma, Indonesia, Bali, Borneo, Brunei and beyond.

The findings at Bujang Valley speak of an ancient Indian/Hindu presence in Kedah. There were Chinese settlements in Pahang and Kelantan around the 13th-14th century and in 12th century in Singapore. The early Brunei Sultanate had a Chinese Queen. One need not ponder at length the implications of Angkor Wat and Borobudur or that 40%-50% of Bahasa Malaysia comprises Sanskrit/Tamil words.

To illustrate, some of these word are :
bumi = boomi
putra = putran

raja = rajah
desa = thesam
syakti = sakthi
kolam = kulam
bahaya = abahya
jaya = jeya
maha = maha
aneka = aneha
nadi = naadi
kedai = kadai
mahligai = maaligai
mantra = manthrum
tandas = sandas
(This list can go on)
An extremely important archeological find that pointed to one of the greatest empires in history

- the Raja Cholan empire that ruled from the Maldives through India, Sri Lanka and right down to South East Asia found deep in the jungles of Johor a few years ago and made headlines in the mainstream newspapers in 2005, suddenly disappeared from the news…..

The time has arrived for us to record our history as the facts tell us and not as we would like to wish it.